Social Media influence on the 2012 Elections

Social Media influence on the 2012 Elections

Social Media influence on the 2012 Elections

Social Media influence on the 2012 Elections

Which came first, the voter or the Tweeter? Or, as the case may be, the Tumblr, YouTuber, or Facebooker? There is no doubt that the 2012 presidential election will be remembered as the first with mainstream use of social media. A recent Pew Research study found 60 percent of adults now use social media, and 39 percent have used it as an outlet to discuss politics. President Obama has 32 million Facebook fans, and Republican candidate Mitt Romney boasts 12 million. Obama’s first message following the announcement of his electoral win went out to his 1.7 million Twitter followers: This happened because of you. Thank you, he tweeted. Another post-victory message of “Four more years,” and a photo or the President hugging first lady Michelle Obama became the most highly-retweeted message in the company’s six-year history.

Obama may have won the 2008 election in part because of his strategic use of social media, but in 2012 there weren’t many candidates who didn’t follow suit. Analysts are now left to determine what impact tools such as Facebook, Twitter and Youtube had on election results, as well as if and how well social media buzz predicted election results.

Facebook Inc. (FB)’s internal Talk Meter, which measures how often events are posted on the network—rates the election the most talked about event in 2012. During election day alone, Facebook saw more than 71 million election-related posts and comments and Obama was mentioned 10 million times. According to social media analysis firm Attention, 64 percent of presidential race conversation across all networks mentioned Obama, compared to Romney’s 36 percent. But do political posters influence others or might they just as well be talking to themselves?

Just as American voters are often highly polarized, so are their social networks. Most people form online social circles with similar-minded users. In fact, Pew conducted a poll in March that found 9 percent of social-network users have chosen to block or “unfriend” someone based on a political disagreement. Therefore, when voters post their most persuasive comments online, they are more often than not preaching to the choir.

“Social media helps to reinforce the already strong tendency toward polarization—and worsens those trends in the electorate,” University of Michigan political science professor Michael Heaney told the San Francisco Chronicle. “People search out these little groups where everyone agrees with them.”

If social networking served as any sort of force in the election, it wasn’t because voters used Twitter and Facebook as their personal soap box, but instead because the campaigns used the tools to target messages to particular demographics. While Obama catered to Facebook users in 2008, he showed his savvy in all that is Twitter in 2012, which may have helped reinforce his image with young voters. The Hollywood Reporter noted Obama’s 18 million Twitter followers at the end of August—in the heat of the campaign—dwarfed Romney’s 852,000 followers. Edison Research conducted a national exit poll which found 19 percent of voters were aged 18 to 29, a percent higher than in 2008. Of those young voters, 60 percent voted for Obama.

So did Obama’s larger social media following predict his win, or was it simply a contributing factor? StateTech magazine reported five recent election winners who had more Twitter followers than their opponents, including the gubernatorial races in Louisiana, California, Ohio and Texas, as well as the mayoral race in Chicago.

“While further studies are needed, it appears that social media analytics may be an underutilized resource for predicting presidential election results,” said marketing firm PME 360 CEO Ryan Adams. “It can be argued that social media engagement signifies an informal vote for a candidate.”

So did Twitter win the 2012 presidential election? Or did policy? Or maybe it was Youtube. Blogger Daniel Burrus offers some insight:

“The biggest problem for Mitt Romney and his team was not making an integrated social media strategy a strategic priority,” Burrus wrote. “If it had been a priority, the election may have ended differently.”

Comments

Related News

10 Responses

Leave a Reply
  1. Matt Rego
    mrego123
    Nov 14, 2012 - 10:54 AM

    The President was smart. Look at the facts about how many people are on these sites at a given time, this is a huge potential voting base if you at least attempt to reach out to them and that is what the President did.

    Reply
  2. Samantha Lile
    samanthapl
    Nov 15, 2012 - 01:29 AM

    Definitely sets a precedent for future candidates.

    Reply
  3. mrgambale@gmail.com
    Nov 15, 2012 - 05:23 PM

    Social media is so influential and Obama’s staff addressed these issues when rounding up votes. Twitter and Facebook are bigger than most analysts believe, as these outlets reach across geographic and demographic lines with a click of the mouse. One of romneys biggest mistakes was not addressing the youth of the country.

    Reply
    • Lennox Yieke
      lyieke
      Nov 21, 2012 - 04:46 AM

      I like your point very much. The youth are and always will be the heart of every election moving forward. Now more than ever, the youth are aware of the opportunities that life presents. This means that their vote will most likely be swayed in the direction of a candidate who actively represents their interests.

      Reply
  4. Lennox Yieke
    lyieke
    Nov 21, 2012 - 04:44 AM

    Obama’s move to widen his social footprint well before the election was a move that will be copied by many candidates to come. Comparing Obama’s following on social media with Romney’s; it is clearly evident that there is some real daylight between the two. Some pundits are arguing that social was in deed the magic bullet that Obama needed and used.

    Reply
  5. mrgambale@gmail.com
    Nov 24, 2012 - 09:53 PM

    Moving forward, all campaigns need to address the topic of social media and it’s ramifications on results. There needs to be more attention given to the youth to have a chance to capture their vote.

    Reply
  6. Lillie
    Dec 10, 2012 - 06:18 PM

    Just a thought. Obama has used social media and cyber space much more adeptly than his opponents in all of his political races.

    Reply
  7. Lennox Yieke
    lyieke
    Dec 12, 2012 - 02:41 AM

    With the use of social media trending, the next election will see the overwhelming use of social media. Expect most campaign budgets to factor this in.

    Reply
    • Samantha Lile
      samanthapl
      Jan 03, 2013 - 05:07 AM

      I agree on all points, but I must wonder… wasn’t the same thing said after Obama won in 08? And yet the GOP still failed to speak to America’s youth on their level…

      Reply
  8. mrgambale@gmail.com
    Jan 04, 2013 - 08:40 PM

    Yup. You are absolutely right. In fact, his strategy was revealed during his crazy battle with Hilary Clinton. Going after the youth, etc.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Connect with:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *